I have never called you personally an oil thief.
But if I had the evidence, I would not hesitate for the tiniest part of a pico-sec to do so.
However, you did get some things right; I would also not shy away from the terms liar, fraud, propagandist and/or charlatan when applied to you. If the shoe fits, matey.
What you undeniably are is an oil theft denier, and I do not hesitate to allow, in fact I would actively encourage, the comparison to holocaust denier, for the illegal invasion of Iraq etc is exactly equivalent, and 'run' by the same order of criminals; further, and also not just BTW, the illegal etc. now turned brutal occupation has become an equivalent genocide.
Having got me going, you can have some more, here comes the second barrel (haw!): BLAM! Defenders of criminals make themselves criminals - of the same order, and that means equally guilty - by the accessory mechanism. GWBush&Co deserve exactly the same treatment as handed out at Nuremberg. Think about where that might get an oil theft denier. Even more: many people - quite cruelly, but nevertheless, blamed then, and blame to this day, the 'ordinary German people' for the Nazis' horrendous misdeeds. You could possibly contemplate, Mr x, what the enlightened world's population now think of the 'ordinary Yank.'
1 comment:
he is ...
.. you are
-=*=-
It has been brought to my attention, that x has called one'a Margo's pets an outrageous economic illiterate.
Proof, as if any more were needed, of x's cowardice, dishonesty and thuggery. In short, just another typical Yank, and lying troll to boot.
Q: Exactly how does this accord with WD's famous ethics, aka a so-called 'safe place' for debate?
Post a Comment