some of my 'best' friends are ...

.. [negative attribute[1]] (but they're not really my best).

Subtitle: The webdiary problem bis[2]; the place some of us assumed to be a solution - but sadly is not.

Preamble: As is my wont, this piece is long-winded - for the purpose of being as free-standing as possible.

-=*=-

"Ah have a dream ..."

Not every Amerikan is a s**t, nor is what some of them say all s**t.

But in a (so-called) democracy, everyone is held responsible for their government - and what that government does, as in when we the anti-wars tried saying "Not in our name!" - and were contradicted by the (filthy) pro-wars (amongst others); but this much must be clear:

a) IF we have a true democracy THEN we are responsible

b) OR we do not have any sort'a democracy, except 'sham.'

A quick reminder of some things prerequisite to a true democracy:

1) an aware and engaged electorate

2) full, frank and accurate information

3) a fair and varied choice of candidates

4) (should be assumed) a fair electoral process.

Some of these will be elaborated upon below, but one point is to be emphasised: Aussies and Poms are held responsible for their (government's) actions, and the US and Israel, combined à la M-W as USrael, are to be held responsible for their crimes - which are many and vicious, of sufficient notoriety in fact, to qualify USrael as a notional 4th Reich.

-=*=-

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal ..." but as in an old joke, webdiary holds some to be more equal than others. (Hiss! - But no sour grapes, Oh no!) More equal than others is 'just' anti-democratic - and anti free speech, to boot. A minimum of true names will receive mention; although Voltaire's (misquoted) idea of free speech may be a bit extreme, one of the webdiary ideas is 'a safe place for all opinion;' too bad they failed, and continue to fail.

My stance: Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one (sorry if that's Ameri-speak, spit!) - and they are largely indistinguishable. What're far more important are facts - and above facts, results.

The facts of importance are at least three:

1) the USrael 4th Reich is committing crimes on an almost incomprehensibly vast and despicable scale

2) these crimes are (largely) hidden by the lying, corrupt and venal MSM (including big bits'a the AusBC & SBS; boo!)

3) and apart from the direct human suffering caused by these heinous crimes, the process is thought (99.9% probability) to be crippling our planet's ability to support (human, let alone any/all) life.

I see the responsibility of all honest wo/men to endeavour to eliminate all USraeli crime, and as a corollary, I regard any not so disposed to exposing/eliminating these crimes to be a) 'enemy' and b) worse, themselves criminal, as defined by the 'accessory'[4] concept.

The sought-for result would be truth and justice for all, in the absence of all USraeli crime [see footnote^].

-=*=-

So now, having established 'the big picture,' we come to 'the crunch.'

Before being so rudely interrupted, I wrote in a WD post (paraphrased):

"The time for all discussion is over; we have to move to (effective) action."

Up until that point, a loose coalition, who may be termed 'the honest united,' had been working solidly away, and had succeeded in ridding WD of most of the (criminal!) anti-progress elements, and other anti-thought types (pro-religious, say) were successfully being discouraged. Note that the vanquished or disgruntled or both did not have their opinions blocked, only successfully countered. Some managed to get themselves banned (but not announcedly so, one of several occurrences of "more equal than others.")

Some sort'a coordinated 'putsch'[5] was mounted (I 'believe'[6] less and less in coincidence), with the result that most'a the 'baddies' came back, either under their usual names or as slimy, dishonest 'constructs'. All this has been documented. The result is as obvious as it is lamentable, see for example Damian's post here (g'day).

Damian mentions Kingston herself, the brother Alcorn but Roffey must also be included, as collectively being those 'in control' and presumably 'responsible' for allowing/favouring/encouraging(!!?) Damian's termed 'right-wing' elements, although the moderators cannot avoid some responsibility themselves, under the Nuremberg (non!) defence: "I was only taking orders!" Sorry fellas (ladies?); doesn't wash.

The 'name' of a prime 'right-wing' offender is mentioned, namely Eliot Ramsey, s/he is only one of several malefactors (previous 'names' used by Ramsey having been C Parsons and the earlier spinifex (how droll: "spin effects"), also in other forums. But who cares; what's in a name?

Note (also to Daniel): left/right should (rightly!) be abandoned; far more important is right/wrong, or better truth seekers vs. liars, justice seekers vs. criminals. The vast human majority is not criminal (psychopathic) - the real question must be put: why do we (the sheople®) accept being 'ruled' and simultaneously ripped-off by these obscenely fat-cat psychopaths?

Nevertheless, one real/pseudo name must be mentioned, namely David Davis/Harry Heidelberg. This turd provided a home away from home for webdiary reject/refugees, it was (still is?) a place where webdiary was roundly cursed. HH: "I'll never go back!" - but he did, and he 'led' lots'a his 'disciples' back with him (and yes, HH does have a 'g*d'-complex). Good one, Harr'ä!

-=*=-

Since the putsch and my exit (who cares if the two are related or not) - but as I've said, unlikely not to have been merely coincidental, Ramsey and other such utter s**ts have come to dominate the discourse more and more, with at least one effect as obvious as it is dreadful: any thoughts of effective action, let alone any action at all, have evaporated from discussion in webdiary. Mission accomplished - for the baddies, but not just: actively assisted by webdiary management/staff themselves.

Good one, fellas (ladies?)

Webdiary is seen to serve the powers of darkness.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] attribute

(stress on the first syllable)

1 he has all the attributes of a top midfield player
QUALITY, feature, characteristic, trait, element, aspect, property, hallmark, mark, distinction, sign, telltale sign, sure sign; idiosyncrasy, peculiarity, quirk.

2 the hourglass was depicted as the attribute of Father Time
SYMBOL, indicator, mark, sign, hallmark, trademark, status symbol. [Oxford Pop-up]

[2] bis
adverb Music (as a direction) again.
ORIGIN via French and Italian from Latin, literally twice [ibid.]

[3] sham
—v. (-mm-) 1 feign, pretend. 2 pretend to be. —n. 1 imposture, pretence. 2 bogus or false person or thing. —adj. pretended, counterfeit. [origin unknown] [POD]

[4] accessory
n. (pl. -ies) 1 additional or extra thing. 2 (usu. in pl.) small attachment, fitting, or subsidiary item of dress (e.g. shoes, gloves). 3 (often foll. by to) person who abets or is privy to an (esp. illegal) act. [medieval Latin: related to *accede] [ibid.]

[5] putsch
n. attempt at political revolution; violent uprising. [Swiss German] [ibid.]

[6] 'believe,' word used advisedly, since it is tainted by religious overtones; religion itself being a crime against humanity. Why that, you might ask? Simply this: religion, and any conceptual 'g*d(s)' so attached, are imaginary constructs without a single shred of substantiative evidence. Instilling any religious concept into an immature mind, i.e. children's, amounts to a most vicious form of child abuse.

[^Footnote]: USraeli crimes are not restricted to 'war' crimes, such as brutally invading countries then continuing the vile and criminal murdering as occupiers, all to enable the theft of resources (oil, 'coltan' etc), land and water - Oh, no! The military crimes may be considered to be only the tip of a very large (and filthy!) iceberg; the 'rest' of the crimes concern the modus operandi of (largely) US business à la the Harvard Business School (for Sharks) model vis-à-vis resources, say, as documented by Perkins' "Economic hit man" (a new follow-up is Hiatt's "A game as old as empire"). One only needs to examine the Aussie 'resource-boom' to see this in operation. Our wide-brown is having its riches ripped out as we are being ripped-off; apart from wages, we the people (or 'we the sheople®' when not paying proper attention) are getting as little as a miserly 30% of the profits, after all dirty-accountancy pre-tax rip-offs, natch. I invite you to imagine that: already obscenely fat-cat capitalists are 'walking off' with the vast bulk of our natural resource riches; soon all we'll be left with is yawningly empty holes - and equally empty wallets. Just why that? Wake up, sheople!

[cross post attempt failed]