.. to keep the honest out.
Subtitle: When webdiary bans someone, they stay banned, no?
-=*=-
C Parsons submitted his/her last post to webdiary:
«New problem for "peace" activists looming...
Submitted by C Parsons on June 9, 2007 - 10:23am»
Oddly enough, the very next post published was this:
«What a shame
Submitted by Margo Kingston on June 9, 2007 - 12:44pm.
Hello. I've just caught up on the action and am deeply sorry Craig and Richard have left us...»
[Of course they both came back - but not C Parsons, because...]
«Joe Lieberman is irrelevant I think
Submitted by Eliot Ramsey on June 12, 2007 - 12:25pm.»
Funny, Eh? Hardly 3 days between 'em - actually more like 2, when actual publication delays are included.
But what's this?
«Contingent reinforcement
Submitted by Fiona Reynolds on February 11, 2008 - 4:47pm.
We moderators have been somewhat perplexed over the past few weeks, Eliot. ... However, your usual pattern of "remorseless ridicule" is both offensive and tedious.
See you on St Patrick's Day.»
Eliot is suspended for 5 weeks. Didn't last, look here:
«Danger in misreading the Nazi experience
Submitted by Pauline P Kennedy on February 16, 2008 - 3:21pm.»
.. then here:
«Standards
Submitted by Pauline P Kennedy on February 16, 2008 - 3:42pm.»
.. and here:
«Here's to the future
Submitted by Pauline P Kennedy on February 16, 2008 - 3:47pm.»
.. finally (for the moment):
«Speaking as a Kennedy myself
Submitted by Pauline P Kennedy on February 18, 2008 - 9:42am.»
The 1st includes a long screed on Hitler, one'a C Parsons' favourite topics.
The latest includes a misleading reference to "The Guardian" but more interesting, a reference to an "indymedia" site; go to the link, scroll to the 1st comment... Ta Ra!
«Troubling times ahead for China
Posted by: Eliot Ramsey at Feb 14, 2008 17:42»
Note that the 1st three were submitted in a tight group, but didn't become 'visible' (i.e. released by the moderators) until sometime in the hour before Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:51.
The 1st three posts were 'in limbo' for some 29 hours, presumably until "Pauline P Kennedy" was accepted as a 'genuine' name, à la WD's wont.
But I wonder. Is Eliot being 'set up' by Pauline?
Is Pauline actually Eliot?
Russian dolls:
Is Eliot actually Chris Parsons, aka C Parsons?
Is C Parsons actually spinifex - who infested indymedia?
IMHO, "Yes" to all. So much, once again, for WD's so-called 'ethics.'
-=*=-
A comment:
«"S/he's a walkin' talkin' Russian doll;" apologies to Sir Cliff.»
Another comment:
Q: Why does it matter? A: Because fake-IDs are lies, and 'goodies' don't lie. But worse/worser/worst: spinifex/C Parsons/Eliot Ramsey/Pauline P Kennedy is on the wrong side, aka the 'dark side;' s/he supports the filthily criminal mass-murdering for spoil USrael m/i-plex.
2008/02/18
locks are only useful ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yet your partner on the left (and owner of one of the blogs you visit regularly) David G/Daniel S uses a false name.
Q: Why does it matter? A: Because fake-IDs are lies, and 'goodies' don't lie.
Guess that tells us where you place David/Daniel on your goodies/baddies scale.
liars are just the tip ...
.. of a very dirty - criminal - iceberg.
-=*=-
G'day Anon-whoever,
and how funny is it, that you query someone's name - without supplying your own? While we're at it, I suppose you have noticed that I'm also deploying a nom de plume? Probably for the same/similar reason(s) as DanS/DavG does; but *not* the same reason(s) as spinifex/C Parsons/Eliot Ramsey/Pauline P Kennedy?
-=*=-
If one models the universe in one's mind - as I do - then in 3D, truths are like zero-dimension points of solid gold (yes, contradiction in terms; we are going poetical), and adding time as the 4th dimension, the gold points become thin, sparkling straight as a die 1D gold threads.
The universe of lies, on the other hand, is all the otherwise empty space of this model; infinite in extent. (Not even bordered by the CMB's dull glow.)
Spinifex/C Parsons/Eliot Ramsey/Pauline P Kennedy is an outright liar, s/he deploys fake-IDs to deceive - and to 'game' the WD system.
But not 'just' to deceive, s/he propagandises 'on behalf of' the USrael 'murder for spoil' m/i-plex. And is also, therefore, equally as criminal as that filthy USrael m/i-plex is; as criminal, in fact, as those executed following the Nuremberg trials were alleged to be[1,2].
-=*end*=-
Ref(s):
[1] Crime against peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For committing this crime, the Nuremberg Tribunal sentenced a number of ... is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that ...
[wiki/Crime_against_peace]
[2] Crime against humanity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On the other hand, an individual may be guilty of crimes against humanity ... conclusions about allegations of crimes committed during the invasion of Iraq ...
[wiki/Crimes_against_humanity]
Post a Comment