public warning re: webdiary

Subtitle: vorsicht, fools (some criminal) at 'work.'

Preamble: the following may well be 'the long way around;' that is both my prerogative and pleasure. As to any "Why?" I would simply answer "Because," and then add that I am possessed of a morality which decries all lies and calls for justice via truth.

-=*=-

I arbitrarily date my history from the 1945 US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which I regard as purely criminal acts (as distinct, say, from 'war' crimes). Others (like William Blum) mention the US 'annexation' of Hawaii in 1893; here is a good summary of 'the lot' (whether complete or not, it really is 'a lot.' Should that link not work (I like citing the apk where I originally found it), try indopedia or whatreallyhappened). My point: although not generally regarded as a mostly criminal enterprise (up to and including cold-blooded mass-murder for spoil), that the US is so criminal should not be up for any sort'a 'debate,' the documentation being compelling. I maintain that facts are not subject to debate; anyone 'pushing' such a (fake!) debate is on a fool's errand.

For the title of 'world's most immoral,' the US has only one serious rival, namely Israel. As accomplices, boosters and accessories before, during and after the fact, the UK and Aus stand out (it remains to be seen if the recent regime-change in Canberra is as ineffective as the Blair->Brown one was in the overall US relationship scheme of things.) That is not to ignore others, say Germany, France or Japan; one wonders why any would accept the US criminal behaviour or have any dealings with the US at all, unless self-corrupt or coerced.

To extend my preamble, "Why does any of this matter?" can be answered with "Because the system is broken;" the system which may appear to be functioning 'as is' is in fact wrecking our once jewel-like planet, whilst criminally swindling the vast majority of us - we the people, or 'we the sheople®' when not paying proper attention - swindling us to further enrich an already obscenely wealthy few. This 'functioning as is' appearance is maintained mostly via the machinations of a corrupt MSM (i.e. main-stream media: TV, radio & print but mostly TV including big bits'a the AusBC & SBS); how they coordinate is a mystery (to me, at least). Thanks (but "No, thanks!") to GWBush&Co and their filthy invasion of Iraq now turned brutal occupation, each more criminally murderous than the other, my eyes were opened to these world's most immoral operations and my once-preferred vehicle for saying so was webdiary. I assumed a mature and aware audience and expected a 'fair shake,' both from that audience and webdiary itself, seeing them as 'honest brokers.' Sadly, not so.

-=*=-

Some of the worst problems occur when expectations are disappointed; one need only consider divorce, say. In this respect, one may consider this piece as resulting from my 'divorce' from webdiary (believe me; I'm happy to be out). One disappointment was the discovery that webdiary was partly populated by 'black-hats,' some cleverer than others and some, like the US/Israel, outright criminal in intent (if not, as in the US/Israel case, actual practice). Black-hats' names no longer matter (some previously mentioned by me), and some of them known to be false, despite webdiary so-called requirements/ethics. As well as 'black-hats' in the audience, I encountered problems with webdiary moderation. The most memorable encounter (apart from the terminal one) was the dialectic dilettante/cabal episode. Details here also no longer matter, but the exposed problem does (which is corrupt moderation), in that instance against me and in favour of the I/J/Z-plex.

As any other disgruntled type, I could possibly be accused of 'sour grapes;' any such accusation would be summarily rejected. I have recently returned from an exceedingly pleasant holiday (over 230,000 vertical metres skied, predominantly 'black') and in my optimism, I tried reading a bit of the recent stuff over at webdiary - but was utterly aghast to see the interactions with the same-old same-old criminal-intent black-hats. And sadly, some highly respected white-hats continue to stoop to engage the blacks. The blacks, in turn, are allowed/encouraged/protected(!!?) by webdiary management/moderators. Boo! Hiss!

-=*=-

And so to my public warning. Fazit[1]: forewarned is forearmed; debating criminals is pointless. Further, just like watching some Hollywood film and deluding yourself by thinking "I'm OK; it's only a movie," reading corrupt material may (and most probably will) corrupt the reader. Even further, attempting to debate criminals only lends them credibility.

There should never be debating with criminals, they belong in gaol. As do any/all aiders and abettors.

-=*end*=-

PS Friendly message, boys: face it, you(we) are dealing with deception and dishonesty when not outright criminality. As such, 'the enemy' are by definition liars, possibly criminal[2] and probably psychopathic[3]. And so as crooked as they are, you can't score points let alone 'win' since their 'rules' (if they have any at all) are quite different to yours. Dealing with them in any way is also most likely to be furthering their evil agenda, why else are they there?

Ref(s):

[1] Fazit, previously misspelt by me as 'facit.' From German, my intention is 'a final summary.'

[2] criminal

Ønoun
she struck up a friendship with a convicted criminal
LAWBREAKER, offender, villain, delinquent, malefactor, culprit, wrongdoer, transgressor, sinner; young offender, juvenile delinquent; felon, thief, robber, armed robber, burglar, housebreaker, shoplifter, mugger, fraudster, swindler, racketeer, gunman, gangster, outlaw, bandit, terrorist, rapist; (in Japan) yakuza; informal crook, con, jailbird, (old) lag, lifer, baddie; N. Amer. informal yardbird, yegg; Austral. informal crim; S. African informal lighty; W. Indian informal tief; Brit. rhyming slang tea leaf; informal, dated cracksman; law malfeasant, misfeasor, infractor; archaic miscreant, trespasser, trusty, transport; rare peculator, defalcator.
-opposite(s): LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN.

Øadjective
1 they were found guilty of criminal conduct
UNLAWFUL, illegal, illicit, illegitimate, lawbreaking, lawless, felonious, delinquent, culpable, villainous, nefarious, corrupt, fraudulent; indictable, punishable, actionable, unauthorized, unsanctioned, outlawed, banned, forbidden, interdicted, proscribed; wrong, bad, evil, wicked, iniquitous; informal crooked, shady, dirty; Brit. informal bent, dodgy; law malfeasant.
-opposite(s): LAWFUL.

2 (informal) closing the railway would be criminal folly
DEPLORABLE, preposterous, shameful, reprehensible, disgraceful, inexcusable, unforgivable, unpardonable, unacceptable; senseless, foolish, ridiculous, outrageous, monstrous, shocking, scandalous; wicked, sinful, immoral, iniquitous; rare egregious.
-opposite(s): COMMENDABLE.

[New Oxford Thesaurus of English]

[3] psychopath
noun a person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behaviour.
DERIVATIVES
psychopathic adjective
psychopathically adverb.

[The NEW OXFORD Dictionary
OF ENGLISH]