the table of manipulated illiteracy

The table (refer to is this someone's (Fiona Reynolds'?) idea); the left is 1st copy, the right is 'final.' The font has been changed to a mono-spaced, and 'filler' characters (i.e. ^) have been added as appropriate, to make the comparison easier. Many changes are 'only' cosmetic, others go to the troll's illiteracy (but again, why change at all?) Note, the table is a looong way down; don't know why, but please scroll down.

[original] There's a little there for everyone	[forgery?] There's a little there for everyone
in Guantanamo Habeas Corpus- the road to freedom	in Guantanamo Habeas Corpus- the road to freedom
by Paul Morrella on June 17, 2008 - 5:21am	by Paul Morrella on June 17, 2008 - 5:21am
Richard Tonkin, naturally the latest ruling is seen straight down the lens of political convenience; thus, rendering most opinions on it, completely meaningless.	Richard Tonkin, naturally the latest ruling is seen straight down the lens of political convenience; thus^ rendering most opinions on it^ completely meaningless.
I'd add ruling against capital punishment as another reluctance shown by the Courts - though, I think you get the drift. Any person of the belief that this ruling negates the legality of holding the detainees is going to be sadly disappointed. Any person believing that American Courts; a bastion of soft liberal tenda^cies are going to be even more disappointed still. The decision of course makes absolutely no judgement on the detainees^ guilt or innocence. Now unless one comes from the school of terrorism is all a figment of the imagination; the odds are pretty good that at least someone will be found guilty, and to borrow a phrase: "they'll fry for their sins".	I'd add ruling against capital punishment as another reluctance shown by the courts - though, I think you get the drift. Any person of the belief that this ruling negates the legality of holding the detainees is going to be sadly disappointed. Any person believing that American courts^ a bastion of soft liberal tendencies are going to be even more disappointed ^^^^^. The decision of course makes absolutely no judgement on the detainees' guilt or innocence. Now unless one comes from the school of terrorism is all a figment of the imagination; the odds are pretty good that at least someone will be found guilty, and to borrow a phrase: "they'll fry for their sins".
...	...
What does it mean politically? Well, that all depends on the luck of the draw - and^ of naturally^ the timing ^^ it. Whilst it's true mitigating circumstances of innocence haven't been public, neither have circumstances regarding guilt. This particular "cone of legal silence" will not persist in an American Federal Court. It doesn't automatically play that this is a good thing for any particular pol^tical stance moving into election 2008.	What does it mean politically? Well, that all depends on the luck of the draw - and, ^^ naturally, the timing of it. Whilst it's true mitigating circumstances of innocence haven't been public, neither have circumstances regarding guilt. This particular "cone of legal silence" will not persist in an American Federal Court. It doesn't automatically play that this is a good thing for any particular political stance moving into election 2008.
Playing devil^s advocate, what does this mean for McCain? It means he gets down on his knees (find a God if he hasn't already got one), and prays. He prays the best (and not brightest) bunch of criminal cretins find their way to the head of the habeas corpus queue.	Playing devil's advocate, what does this mean for McCain? It means he gets down on his knees (find a God if he hasn't already got one), and prays. He prays the best (and not brightest) bunch of criminal cretins find their way to the head of the habeas corpus queue.
In the case of such a events taking place the detainees will face the highest political Court in the land; ^^^ Court of public opinion, and trial by media. At such a time, constant references to Obama's voting patterns will find a very monotonous regularity of appearing. References to his middle name (not by McCain of course; most certainly not), will not be going MIA either.	In the case of such a events taking place the detainees will face the highest political court in the land: the court of public opinion, and trial by media. At such a time, constant references to Obama's voting patterns will find a very monotonous regularity of appearing. References to his middle name (not by McCain of course; most certainly not), will not be going MIA either.
[original] The Saving Of Backsides	[forgery?] The saving of backsides
in The troops come home, the lies are revealed	in The troops come home, the lies are revealed
by Paul Morrella on June 13, 2008 - 5:07am	by Paul Morrella on June 13, 2008 - 5:07am
Michael de Angelos^	Michael de Angelos:
^My question really was where are our memorials for them- who we would not have won the war without?	“My question really was where are our memorials for them - without whom we would not have won the war?
	Note: She actually changed a quote!
Well, if you were^ say^ from England/Europe you may have a point (before the USSR destroyed the goodwill). I highly doubt it was the reason Australia or the United States eventually won their respective battles. Still, you could argue Russia should think about a memorial to the lend lease program. If nothing eles, it'd be a nice touch.	Well, if you were, say, from England/Europe you may have a point (before the USSR destroyed the goodwill). I highly doubt it was the reason Australia or the United States eventually won their respective battles. Still, you could argue Russia should think about a memorial to the lend lease program. If nothing else, it'd be a nice touch.
[original] The Never Ending War	[forgery?] The never ending war
in The troops come home, the lies are revealed	in The troops come home, the lies are revealed
by Paul Morrella on June 12, 2008 - 12:41am	by Paul Morrella on June 12, 2008 - 12:41am
Richard:^ ^I haven't picked up on the Holocaust stuff and if I haven't I apologise.  Holocaust denial is quite rightly an unconsidered opinion base on Webdiary.  Interested in where you detected this.. I try to be on the lookout.^	Richard:: “I haven't picked up on the Holocaust stuff and if I haven't I apologise. ^Holocaust denial is quite rightly an unconsidered opinion base on Webdiary. ^Interested in where you detected this.. I try to be on the lookout.”
I don't think anyone has posted denial of the Holocaust on this thread. The allegation I've read (more than once) is that Jews use the Holocaust as an excuse for bad deeds upon others.	I don't think anyone has posted denial of the Holocaust on this thread. The allegation I've read (more than once) is that Jews use the Holocaust as an excuse for bad deeds upon others.
There's never any proof given (I've never witnessed any), that Jews use this as an excuse for "apparent gains". Maybe I'm wrong, and someone can correct me, who knows? All I can say is that its ^^ not happened to date.	There's never any proof given (I've never witnessed any)^ that Jews use this as an excuse for "apparent gains". Maybe I'm wrong, and someone can correct me, who knows? All I can say is that it has not happened to date.
The idea of an all powerful "Israeli Lobby" censoring descent is absolutely ludicrous. This particular subject would be the numero uno descent subject on the net. There are literally tens of thousands of sites pro and anti Israel. Everybody gets more than their fair share of "voice" on the subject.	The idea of an all powerful "Israeli Lobby" censoring dissent is absolutely ludicrous. This particular subject would be the numero uno dissent subject on the net. There are literally tens of thousands of sites pro and anti Israel. Everybody gets more than their fair share of "voice" on the subject.
Richard:  Geoff was being facetious re an Israel Lobby, methinks. As for the quote, Paul, I've amended as that was mine.  Thanks, though, was worrying.	Richard: ^Geoff was being facetious re an Israel Lobby, methinks. As for the quote, Paul, I've amended as that was mine. ^Thanks, though, was worrying.
[original] The Retribution In Heaven	[forgery?] The retribution in heaven
in Hope and loss - a sad Iraqi connection	in Hope and loss - a sad Iraqi connection
by Paul Morrella on June 12, 2008 - 2:22am	by Paul Morrella on June 12, 2008 - 2:22am
Michael de Angelos^ ^The Labor Party must be planning retribution and there is so much to choose from – simply getting at the truth is going to destroy a few careers over the next few years.	Michael de Angelos: "The Labor Party must be planning retribution and there is so much to choose from – simply getting at the truth is going to destroy a few careers over the next few years."
Didn't the government just put him forward for the highest possible Australian award? The continual punishment (international speaking tours, and awards) must be just heart breaking for him.Next week; in a fit of rage, Mr Rudd, may give ^^^ the title Duke, and a fifty acre manor.	Didn't the government just put him forward for the highest possible Australian award? The continual punishment (international speaking tours^ and awards) must be just heart^breaking for him.Next week, in a fit of rage, Mr Rudd, may give him the title Duke, and a fifty acre manor.
[original] Blogs And Life	[forgery?] Blogs And Life
in Road to the Tropics	in Road to the Tropics
Submitted by Paul Morrella on June 7, 2008 - 6:10am.	Submitted by Paul Morrella on June 7, 2008 - 6:10am.
...	...
And a brilliant blog weapon it can be (even when on the receiving end). Strangely enough, the masters of such a blog weapon, generally have the happy knack of knowing the line.	And a brilliant blog weapon it can be (even when on the receiving end). Strangely enough, the masters of such a blog weapon  generally have the happy knack of knowing the line.
PS the most despicable thing I've "blog" witnessed (my eyes still can^t believe it) is a person (in living blog) go against people he once publicly swore loyalty toward; as-well, as make ^ public, private "correspondence". There are many words for this action (which I won't use); however, there are times, people take actions that well deserve the lable: Never to be trusted.	PS the most despicable thing I've "blog" witnessed (my eyes still can't believe it) is a person (in living blog) go against people he once publicly swore loyalty toward; as well as making public, private "correspondence". There are many words for this action (which I won't use); however, there are times, people take actions that well deserve the label: Never to be trusted.
I assure this particular person (actually, I swear to this person), if I ever find myself in a situation of being helpful or hurtful toward you (may never happen, and hopefully for him it doesn't), I will make my full opinion known. There's an art to picking up friends, and there's a real art finding enemies - the test for you; has been past ^ with flying colors.	I assure this particular person (actually, I swear to this person), if I ever find myself in a situation of being helpful or hurtful toward you (may never happen, and hopefully for him it doesn't), I will make my full opinion known. There's an art to picking up friends, and there's a real art finding enemies - the test for you; has been passed with flying colors.