Subtitle: whither WD?
«G'day. Since I started Webdiary in 2000, I've envisaged it as a space for civil discourse between Australians of different political viewpoints – a democratic conversation.»
[Margo Kingston/Editorial Policy]
I'm supposing that the contents of the following:
Where Is This Stolen Oil?
... by Pаul Mоrrella on June 13, 2007 - 1:10pm
Margo: Hmmm. A true
... by Pаul Mоrrella on June 13, 2007 - 2:00pm
You Say Illiberal, I say Liberal
... by Pаul Mоrrella on June 13, 2007 - 2:11pm
Here we go....it's the "evil materminds behind world history"
... by Eliоt Ramѕey on June 13, 2007 - 2:29pm
Beware of 'The Claw'
... by Eliоt Ramѕey on June 13, 2007 - 4:44pm
Phil, Gary I am sure you have the heart in the illiberal place
... by Pаul Mоrrella on June 13, 2007 - 9:51pm
- are all perfect examples of your wished-for 'civil discourse,' eh Margo? I direct the question also to David R.
Lol. That obvious?
-=*=-
Anyone can have a proof-free blog - ask your mate 'over there;' that's one'a his specialities. Unsubstantiated discussions are toadally worthless. - Oh! Only IMHO, of course! Is WD to degenerate into ever more senseless blather; empty-headed nattering?
WD 'moderators' may take liberties; any 'cosmetic improvement' could obscure 'keyboard finger-prints,' say, and chopping out bits - like removing a "Prove it ain't so!" challenge - must be considered a bit undemocratic, if not outright autocratic/dictatorial. Hmmm? Is this sort'a manipulation how WD implements "free speech?" Not happy, Margo.
Again IMHO, the nature of the posts from both Mоrrella and Ramѕey indicate either ignorant interference or deliberate derailing/obstruction - i.e. they are time-wasters at best or simply 'trolls.' The only questions are two: a) are they sick, volunteer pro-murder for oil propagandists (as opposed to some sort'a 'professionals;' any difference being 'merely' the degree of criminality) and b) what is WD gunna do about 'em?
Tip: Allow them to waste ever-more of our Oh, so precious time?
As with the chaos in the remnants of old-Palestine, the illegally invaded now brutally occupied Iraq - and possibly/probably some/most/all of the other so-called "Al-Qaeda" trouble-spots, say, exactly whose interests are being served?
Tip: Follow the (grubby US oil) money!
-=*=-
All the while, the greedastrophe® gets ever more unavoidable, ever closer, ever more disastrous. How/where should we spend our last gasps? "On the Beach?" (But with no petrol for one last run of our Ferraris; the US having stolen it all? Just get in, take the pill.)
-=*end*=-
PS
«Not really, just a decade or so experience on and off similar forums.»
[Pаul Mоrrella on May 27, 2007 - 12:52pm]
Oh, do tell?
Web Results 1 - 2 of 2 for "Pаul Mоrrella". (0.12 secs)
Must'a all been on and off non-indexed forums until WD, eh?
Bye Pаul. Again. Bye Eliоt. Or should that be "Goodnight from him?"
2 comments:
Phil, there's a lot of evidence (not quite conclusive) to indicate that Eliot Ramsey is just a reincarnated C. Parsons. Note the patronisig similarity in patter and jargon that Ramsey uses; sound familiar?
G'day Damian,
and yes, the same thought has occurred to me.
I think that seep might'a compromised himself with this Manly quote:
Prominent Sydney atheist identity opposes Dawkins's positi
Submitted by C Parsons on June 2, 2007 - 1:09pm.
"...non-other than Left-wing Sydney local government identity, Brad Pedersen, the atheistic independent Acting Mayor of Manly..."
last seep post:
New problem for "peace" activists looming...
Submitted by C Parsons on June 9, 2007 - 10:23am
Here's ER's 1st post:
Joe Lieberman is irrelevant I think
Submitted by Eliot Ramsey on June 12, 2007 - 12:25pm
-=*=-
Then there's the Pol Pot rubbish, and
...(in my archive; 2005-now) of 8 'primary' mentions of "Germaine Greer," 1 is mike lyvers, 1 is Solomon Wakeling, 4 are C Parsons, 1 is Michael de Angelos and 1 Eliot Ramsey.
then GLW:
Yasser Arafat - typical US Zionist puppet
Submitted by Eliot Ramsey on June 22, 2007 - 10:34am.
"And appears to have gulled the editors of Green Left Weekly, no less, hardly a radical or extremist newspaper, into providing a platform for Mr Haddad's views."
-=*=-
I'm not a great detective (I know of at least one better), and in a way (I've said it:) "It's all data," but I too think that CP/ER is one person; a liar and pro-Zionist, pro-war propagandist. It's a central theme behind my 'effective counter-propaganda' post of today, title-changed (by MK) from 'partly agree with Damian' as submitted.
Nice to have you 'on the team.'
regards, Phil.
Post a Comment