2009/01/02

every j*w on the planet ...


  .. just as every trigger-puller in the IDF ...

    .. and (possibly worst) every Israeli order-giver ...

are all 'responsible' for the 60+ year carnage inflicted on the poor, hapless Palestinians.

But it's not 'just' those 'primary' irresponsibles, there're more 'layers' of criminal deceit, namely coming from the so-called 'opinion leaders,' prime amongst whom are many politicians of all 'stripes,' and then there's the main-stream media (MSM), including the public broadcasters.

-=*=-

It is well known - to those who care to look - that the entity referred to as Israel is occupying land basically stolen from the 'original' legal owners, namely the Palestinians. The combination of Jews and/or Zionists, whoever they are and who cares what they call themselves, have perpetrated a fraud on the world as they've inflicted murdering theft on the poor, hapless Palestinians to steal their land and water. (Like the US murdering to steal Iraqi oil, why can't these rotten, murdering crooks just *buy* stuff?)

Firing what amounts to a few 'penny-rockets' at their tormentors does not justify the murdering onslaught of the risibly name IDF. Defence is incorrect for the offensive functions being carried out - for 60+ long (bloody!) years now. That's sheer and outright murder - on a genocidal scale.

Every person on the planet who does not unconditionally condemn these lying, thieving Israeli murderers contributes to the crime, with very special mention of the public broadcasters; it's through the media that the lies are propagated, the tax-payer supported public broadcasters especially have no remit whatsoever to retail Israeli propaganda to the tax-paying public.

Stop the killing; no more murdering, thieving war!

PS Well, perhaps not quite "every Jew on the planet," but all those who do not do their utmost to stop the slaughter - as is happening in Gaza right now.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I unconditionally condemn these murdering, avaricious, elitist, racist, severely deranged Israeli-Jews.

They are a cancer that must be cut out before it poisons the whole world!

Cheers.

Anonymous said...

the rule of law ...

  .. is really a rule of lies ...

    .. and the bigger the lie[1], the 'better'

- to deceive us, we the so-called 'democratic' voting sheople®.

-=*=-

G'day David G,

agreed that the Israeli state (regime plus supporters and apologists) is a malignant cancer and that it/they have been poisoning the planet for a looong time. Their accomplice/sponsor the US is in the very same boat, both cheating the rules and murdering for spoil. The question is "How do they get away with it?" and the answer is a) lying and b) laziness (plus wicked inaction by those who could effectively oppose). The criminal perpetrators lie, and the voters are lazy - and 'allow' themselves to be deceived. The sheople hardly have a chance; the propaganda is pervasive.

Here is an example of the politician/MSM nexus setting out to deceive us with half-truths when not outright lies:

The deadly consequences of the games that Israel plays
Michael Shaik
January 1, 2009

  «"Hamas has broken the ceasefire and engaged in an act of aggression against Israel. Israel has responded."— Julia Gillard»
[theage]

Gillard is from one 'side' of Aus politics, but it hardly matters which side in the US, UK, Aus or Israel; the 'message' is always the same: "Us good, them bad." The 'them' can be Palestinians as here, Iraqis, Afghans - anyone who owns some coveted resource.

What Gillard omits to say, is that Israel is occupying stolen Palestinian land, and that Israel continues to push the occupation borders outwards, dispossessing ever more Palestinians. Nor does she say that Israel has one of the best equipped militaries on the planet - while the Palestinians are armed with little more than stones. GWBush was heard in the news this morning to say that weapon-smuggling into Gaza should be stopped - but what he didn't say was that the US freely supplies Israel - with both arms and 'permission' to (murderingly!) deploy them.

When both sides of politics agree on some policy it's called 'bipartisanship,' which, in the case of the voters not agreeing, is *deeply* undemocratic. So it is with aggressive invasions, and many people across the planet demonstrated against the invasion of Iraq - before it even took place. Didn't do much good (if any at all), an indication of just how dysfunctional our so-called democracies are. To reduce the chances of demonstrations, we the sheople are propagandised - in other words, lied to. More un-democracy, and the responsibility for these lies reaching the sheople lies with the MSM, including the public broadcasters.

US-style policies lead to rip-offs up to and including murdering theft across the planet, and if the law stands in the way they just break it, as Oh, so blatantly the US did in invading Iraq and Israel does invading Palestine, each horrid invader going on to brutally occupy.

When the law 'fails' them, the apologists fall back on 'might makes right' - but it doesn't; never has and never will.

-=*end*=-

PS One may 'understand' the criminal perpetrators lying to us, perhaps - but why do people like Gillard, Merkel & Sarkozy assist in such horrid criminality? Why is there no effective opposition, where are the adults?

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] «The Big Lie (German: Große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".»
[wikipedia/Big_Lie]

Anonymous said...

G'day Phil and David, if only the Australian XI had such great spinners as those at the service of USrael ... so, for those who don't know better, including those who still don't even after being informed ... "none so blind" ... some reading matter.

Stephen Zunes - "America's Hidden Role in Hamas's Rise to Power"

An extract:
The myth perpetuated by both the Bush administration and congressional leaders of both parties was that Israel's 2005 dismantling of its illegal settlements in the Gaza Strip and the withdrawal of military units that supported them constituted effective freedom for the Palestinians of the territory. American political leaders from President George W. Bush to House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have repeatedly praised Israel for its belated compliance with a series of U.N. Security Council resolutions calling for its withdrawal of these illegal settlements (despite Israel's ongoing violations of these same resolutions by maintaining and expanding illegal settlements in the West Bank and Golan Heights).

In reality, however, the Gaza Strip has remained effectively under siege. Even prior to the Hamas victory in the Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006, the Israeli government not only severely restricted -- as is its right -- entry from the Gaza Strip into Israel, but also controlled passage through the border crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt, as well. Israel also refused to allow the Palestinians to open their airport or seaport. This not only led to periodic shortages of basic necessities imported through Egypt, but resulted in the widespread wasting of perishable exports -- such as fruits, vegetables and cut flowers -- vital to the territory's economy. Furthermore, Gaza residents were cut off from family members and compatriots in the West Bank and elsewhere in what many have referred to as the world's largest open-air prison.

In retaliation, Hamas and allied militias began launching rocket attacks into civilian areas of Israel. Israel responded by bombing, shelling and periodic incursions in civilian areas in the Gaza Strip, which, by the time of the 2006 cease-fire, had killed over 200 civilians, including scores of children. Bush administration officials, echoed by congressional leaders of both parties, justifiably condemned the rocket attacks by Hamas-allied units into civilian areas of Israel (which at that time had resulted in scores of injuries but only one death), but defended Israel's far more devastating attacks against civilian targets in the Gaza Strip. This created a reaction that strengthened Hamas' support in the territory even more.


Juan Cole - "Gaza 2008: Micro-Wars and Macro-Wars"

Gideon Levy - "And there lie the bodies"

Glenn Greenwald - "Orwell, blinding tribalism, selective Terrorism, and Israel/Gaza"

Some of the comments to this piece prove the point GG is making. And see also other articles by GG.

Chris Hedges - "Lost in the Rubble"