-=*=-
How exquisitely apposite!
«With regard to Geoff's saying you [meant is DD/HH] write things that aren't meant to be read, perhaps he's suggesting that you use your blog to "vent". That you are letting off steam rather then [sic] writing something considered for a target audience.»
[Tony Powers Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 00:20 ]
Venting (one's spleen), or opinionating[1] (unsubstantiated rubbish) would in itself be relatively undamaging (like other forms of self-abuse/release, like masturbation, eh Sol?) - if a) it was done exclusively 'in private,' and if b) it hadn't been for one (criminal!?) stunt, namely the deployment of the
Jay White = Paul Morrella = lying fraud and troll, and then the subsequent re-entry into Webdiary of a swag of DD/HH-refos.
-=*=-
The above heading-keywords are some of the answers to "What are ya?"
That question must be posed because of what you lot have over time posted; now I do not claim to have read everything, everywhere you (filthy!) lot have been, (most of my time is actually and better spent elsewhere), but just to be sure, I list (some[*]) of whom this missive is directed towards:
1. DD/HH, aka David Davis/Harry Heidelberg: the arch-opinionator[1a].
2. GP, aka Geoff Pahoff: the arch-pseud[2] Zionist.
3. Pa, Pa & lit'ly (pron. Pa(Huh?) - Pa(Sss!) - and little-Eee...), aka Pahoff, Parsons & lyvers: part of the local amateur Israel lobby (but see next).
4. C Parsons = Eliot Ramsey = lying fraud and troll.
5. Jay White = Paul Morrella = lying fraud and troll.
6. Two more prime perpetrators, Michael Park & Justin Obodie, the latter known to be a pseudo-[2a] (and not 'just' by name).
7. Any left-over rest[*], Craig Warton, Kathy Farrelly & Hyacinth (the latter a self-confessed and unrepentant children's-minds abuser).
-=*=-
What each and every one of the above perpetrators have in common, is that they have expressed negative opinions of me personally - in direct contrast to what I write about - in other words, they have attacked the messenger, not always or instead of attacking the message. Under free speech - and especially on the internet - one may in general say what one likes; Voltaire misattributed: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." However, when anyone comes out in support if the crimes - bloody big crimes - of the US, UK, Aus & Israel - I feel that I have not just the right, but the solemn duty to object, and that's exactly what this missive is: an humungous objection to injustice, and those who push and/or support it.
-=*=-
An aside: Contrary to any (scandalous!) allegations from the likes of David Roffey, Margo Kingston and/or David Davis/Harry Heidelberg, I do not give a flying f**k about the 'true' identity of any poster; the problem is the deception involved in knowingly deploying a pseudonym - with the dual-prime purposes of deception and performing mischief - and then further compounding the offence by lying about it. Lies are lies, and *one lie* is usually enough to destroy *all* credibility; the identity frauds of JW/PM and CP/ER are hardly on the scale of 'little whites.' The reasoning here is that the lying does not start then stop with the pseudonym, it is carried over by the perpetrators into them pushing the standard, lying paradigm - which alleges, for example, that the US and Israel are justified in their modus operandi, when in fact they (the US and Israeli *regimes*) are murdering in order to steal, and spinning endless and filthy lies as attempted camouflage.
Lies which are passed on to us, via the MSM *including* the publicly financed AusBC & SBS (boo! Hiss!) And these lies are also being pushed by most if not all of the above mentioned perpetrators.
In opposing me personally, the above mob of *paradigm-tools* (yeah; rhymes with fools) oppose my cause, which is in general justice via truth, and specifically to stop the lies, stop the cheating rip-offs, stop the killing and stop the bloody, murdering wars!
Oh, yeah, and stop the CO2-caused greedastrophe®, before it stops us.
-=*end*=-
PS Yes, this is a big spit. And also yes, it is complicated. It is caused by the cognitive dissonance aroused when confronted with massive hypocrisy, i.e. the above or their ilk saying one thing (like "Truth, justice and the 'Merkin way!") but doing the absolute opposite, i.e. lying, cheating, murdering for spoil; US (plus UK & Aus in support) murdering for oil, Israel murdering for land, water. And the conscious misbehaviour of the above-listed perpetrators to rev me further up. Someone has to point all this out; the disgust I feel compels me. But I tell you this (for no extra charge): I would much rather be left in peace, to enjoy every part of every pico-sec.
Harry Heidelberg:
«I don't do debates.
I don't provide evidence.
I don't provide references.
I don't Google on behalf of others.
I issue opinions. I do so in the manner of a sage or cult leader.
If that makes me a boring, opinionated old fart, then I plead guilty. I would also point out that many sages have such characteristics as do cult leaders. It is only the weak who are attracted.
Stay tuned for my next pronouncement from on high.»
[Monday, September 24, 2007 at 21:27]
What complete and utter bullshit! What supreme arrogance! What an arse.
-=*=-
Ref(s):
[1] opinionated adj. dogmatic in one's opinions. [POD]
[1a] -or suffix forming nouns denoting esp. an agent (actor; escalator) or condition (error; horror). [Latin] [ibid.]
[2] pseud colloq. —adj. (esp. intellectually) pretentious; not genuine. —n. such a person; poseur. [from *pseudo-] [ibid.]
[2a] pseudo- comb. form (also pseud- before a vowel) 1 false; not genuine (pseudo-intellectual). 2 resembling or imitating (pseudo-acid). [Greek pseudes false] [ibid.]
[?] The pseudo-word "definately."
Whose is it?
Recently in the DD/HH-blog:
a) JW 4
b) SW 3
c) JO 3
d) CW 2
e) Gif.boy 1
From WD 2007 (spell-checked by Eds?):
SW 2
CP/ER 1
Surjit Wadhwa 1
Are they all dyslexic/illiterate? (Haw!)
«definately
Idiot-speak for "definitely". One of the most common moronic misspellings found on the internet.»
[urbandictionary]
[*] If anyone feels left out or insufficiently insulted, by all means feel free to yammer out a complaint. (yammer colloq. or dial. —n. 1 lament, wail, grumble. 2 voluble talk. —v. utter a yammer. [Old English] [POD])
[cross posted]
